Reader Participation!

Collapse: How Societies Choose to Fail or Succeed Flow: The Psychology of Optimal Experience God\'s Politics : Why the Right Gets It Wrong and the Left Doesn\'t Get It

Dear Reader: I can’t decide which book I should attempt to tackle next. After polishing off the wonderfulness that was Shteyngart’s The Russian Debutante’s Handbook on Saturday—it was so good, I might even attempt to review it—I’ve got three daunting non-fiction works that have been sitting in my to-do pile for some time. If you have a choice amongst the three, leave a comment telling me the book that you believe I should tackle first.

[I mock these types of entreaties when they're made on message boards ... and yet, I've become what I hate. Typical!]

Posted November 27th, 2005 in Booklogging by Geof F. Morris.

5 comments:

  1. Brad:

    I vote for “Flow…”, because being able to pronounce the author’s name at dinner parties will impress the ladies. :)

  2. Geof F. Morris:

    Brad, while this is a case of the pot calling the kettle black, you’re weird, dude. :lol:

  3. Rick King:

    God’s Politics sounds the most interesting to me simply based on the titles.

  4. Daniel Khaykis:

    I’d say “Flow”. Psychology is more interesting to read about than politics – the latter kind of book, from my recent experience, is always either obvious, or idiotic, or way-too-depressing, depending on whether it’s written by well-meaning naive guy, a liberal moron or a realist.

    Then again, i’m on my second month of trying to finish Battlefield Earth while on the subway to/from work (done irregularly in between reading economics stuff).

    If you ythink that Travolta’s movie sucked, you don’t have a first clue till you read the book and realize just how MUCH is sucked. Heck, compared to that atrocity of a movie, Clancy-based flicks are pillars of faithfulness to the original text.

    -DVK


    RAH and LRH once bet who could create the most convincing religion. RAH’s entry was “Stranger in a Strange Land”

  5. Geof F. Morris:

    Oh, the Wallis is sure to be a bit hackneyed in places, but it’s important to me that I read it.

    That said, I’ll actually be reading none of these between now and the end of the year. We’ll see what I pick up in January …

Leave a response:

Note: This post is over 4 years old. You may want to check later in this blog to see if there is new information relevant to your comment.

By submitting a comment here you grant this site a perpetual license to reproduce your words and name/web site in attribution.