<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: You Know It&#8217;s Coming &#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gfmorris.com/2004/05/14/you-know-its-coming/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gfmorris.com/2004/05/14/you-know-its-coming/</link>
	<description>The Life and Times of Geof F. Morris</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 01:03:05 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Geof F. Morris</title>
		<link>http://gfmorris.com/2004/05/14/you-know-its-coming/comment-page-1/#comment-2595</link>
		<dc:creator>Geof F. Morris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 May 2004 13:22:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ijsm.org/archives/2004/05/14/you-know-its-coming/#comment-2595</guid>
		<description>Oh, I understand that, and I actually think that&#039;s what 6A wants.  From a business perspective, it&#039;s the thing for them to do.  Thing is, you have a ton of power users out there for whom that is not an option---either that they don&#039;t like a centralized hosting service, or they want to roll their own, or whatever.

The biggest hue and cry has been from some of these power users, of course---they&#039;re the big dogs of the blogosphere.  I think 6A will have forseen that.  If they didn&#039;t, they really didn&#039;t think this through.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, I understand that, and I actually think that&#8217;s what 6A wants.  From a business perspective, it&#8217;s the thing for them to do.  Thing is, you have a ton of power users out there for whom that is not an option&#8212;either that they don&#8217;t like a centralized hosting service, or they want to roll their own, or whatever.</p>
<p>The biggest hue and cry has been from some of these power users, of course&#8212;they&#8217;re the big dogs of the blogosphere.  I think 6A will have forseen that.  If they didn&#8217;t, they really didn&#8217;t think this through.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen</title>
		<link>http://gfmorris.com/2004/05/14/you-know-its-coming/comment-page-1/#comment-2594</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 May 2004 21:22:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ijsm.org/archives/2004/05/14/you-know-its-coming/#comment-2594</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve seen this comment (or one very much like it) in a lot of places over the last little bit. I think this misses several things. One, they still have a free version available. The limit of &quot;one author and three blogs&quot; is not great, but certainly passable for most personal users. In fact, for the majority of personal users, they could just use 6A&#039;s TypePad service at a cost that is almost exactly equal to any other hosting service that you&#039;d be doing blogging on.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve seen this comment (or one very much like it) in a lot of places over the last little bit. I think this misses several things. One, they still have a free version available. The limit of &#8220;one author and three blogs&#8221; is not great, but certainly passable for most personal users. In fact, for the majority of personal users, they could just use 6A&#8217;s TypePad service at a cost that is almost exactly equal to any other hosting service that you&#8217;d be doing blogging on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
